Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Pluralism Versus Elitism. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
10 pages in length. The notion of 'us' and 'them' has long formed the tenets of humanity's sociopolitical ladder; whether racial, economic or status, the world is a vast network of divided societies whereby undemocratic ideals reign. Examining the prevalence of elitism compared with pluralism, while a throwback to feudalistic medieval times, leaves little question as to whether man has truly progressed as a civilized species in that he has yet to shed his elitist self-prescribed superiority and embrace a countenance of pluralism's unity. C. W. Mills spoke at length on the reality of the power elite, arguing how the exclusionary manifestation of such a stance does nothing to empower the proletariat but everything to redistribute abundance to the select few. Bibliography lists 10 sources.
Page Count:
10 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCplurlelite.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Examining the prevalence of elitism compared with pluralism, while a throwback to feudalistic medieval times, leaves little question as to whether man has truly progressed as a civilized species in
that he has yet to shed his elitist self-prescribed superiority and embrace a countenance of pluralisms unity. C. W. Mills spoke at length on the reality of the power
elite, arguing how the exclusionary manifestation of such a stance does nothing to empower the proletariat but everything to redistribute abundance to the select few. II. INDIVIDUALITY VERSUS UNITY
Elitism (the notion of a select group of individuals - often royalty - who rule over the people) and pluralism (a democratic approach
whereby the people have a say in how their government and lives are run) are most easily defined as polar opposites when it comes to how a given society is
governed (Nash and Scott, 2004; Mosley, 2009). the United States serves as an example of pluralism whereby the people are interactive with the overall political process. Critical thinkers
from centuries ago recognized the fact that true democracy called for law, constitutions and authoritative institutions which inherently required people to work together in spite of personal agendas; a combination
of strong convictions with a readiness to compromise by recognizing that not all situations will accommodate all people; and a strong sense of individuality and a commitment to civic goods
that did not cater to any one particular person or group. Pluralism is most useful in the study of state and local government due to its current form, one
that has modified from its original principle. As Pait (2003) duly points out, todays culture blurs the line between philosophy and condition, creating
...