Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Philosophies of Government in US and World Affairs Since World War II. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 6 page paper discussing the revisionist, realist and liberalist relations with the Soviet Union and NATO, primary players in world politics since the end of World War II. US involvement with them has fallen into clear schools of thought, taking several approaches. Those of revisionism, realism and liberalism are discussed here. Liberalism has been the rule concerning NATO, and even ultimate focus of US relations with the former Soviet Union was that of liberalism. Though necessarily realist in assessing conditions as they existed, the US did not act from that perspective at all when Mikhail Gorbechev presented avenues by which those relations could take on a more liberalist slant. All of these schools have been used over the decades, but it is liberalism to which we consistently seem to gravitate. Bibliography lists 9 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: CC6_KSnato.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Soviet Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) have been primary players in world politics since the end of World War II. US involvement with them has fallen
into clear schools of thought, taking several approaches. Those of revisionism, realism and liberalism are discussed here. Americans tend to take for
granted the position of the US in the eyes of the rest of the world. A glance at a recent edition of Britains The Economist, one of Great Britains
leading publications and respected around the world, reveals the worlds knowledge of the US. When discussing world leaders, the names of most prime ministers and presidents of other countries
are followed with an identifying statement of their position and their country. Not so with the president of the US. An article about the tornadoes of the midwest
during the first week of May 1999 identify only states names: Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas. There is no identifying line of which country those states are part of or
even their general location within it. As US citizens have come to believe that the office of president is largely that of figurehead
and that it matters little whether the person filling that office can be moral or has any acceptable level of personal integrity, it is difficult for an American citizen to
understand just how much a good portion of the rest of the world looks to the US for leadership in matters of policy and general direction. That is not
to say that the nations of the world are not sovereign entities capable of making their own decisions, but that there generally are three distinctions among the worlds nations:
...