Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Origin of the Universe. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 5 page paper looks at Michio Kaku's theories on the origin of the universe and why they are so important.The subject is discussed philosophically in terms of why man needs to know how the universe began. Hawking is quoted. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_Uniorig.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
question of course is what is the origin of the universe and why is it so important? After all, man exists and if the majority can accept that fact, why
is it relevant to go back millions of years to the very beginning of time? One reason to delve back through the history of man and the Earth as well
is to predict the future. In fact, Professor Michio Kaku, of the City University of New York, believes that the future is predictable and controllable only because scientists have unlocked
the secrets of the past. The professor predicts that within 20 years "we will talk to our tie clips, surf the net via our spectacles and manipulate our genes as
easily as we change socks - unless, that is, were hit by an asteroid before then" (Freeland, 1998, p.48). He notes that up until recently, scientists merely watched nature in
awe but in the future scientists will be more active in manipulating matter and life (Kaku,1998). Yet, the future is only under the control of man because science has finally
understood many formerly obscure facts about matter, life and intelligence (1998). He notes that the discovery of the atom and DNA as well as the creation of the transistor have
led to a variety of revolutions (1998). The study of the origins of the universe is quite relevant then. If man is to predict his own future, inclusive of biological,
spiritual and physical matters, then he would have to understand his past and how the world was made. At least that is how Kaku sees it. But critics have called
him arrogant, noting that his contention that the current era, and the assumption that mans knowledge is superior only now, overlooks other important strides. For example, Fisher (1998) says that
...