Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Opposing Laws Against Gay Marriage. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. Man is constantly reinventing itself as a species in order to maintain an ongoing and progressive status; if he were remain idle without benefit of continued growth and advancement as a collective of living beings, he would soon cease to exist. Whether social, political, economic, cultural or technological, progression is the driving force behind the positive nature of change. Why, therefore, is the notion of gay marriage considered so morally offensive that laws must be enacted to prevent it? If there is one thing that reflects man's capacity for progress and change, it is the tolerance to accept gay marriage as a viable alternative to heterosexual unions; to pass judgment by virtue of legal infiltration is for humanity to inequitably pick and choose which aspects of contemporary evolution are recognized based upon nothing more substantial than personal opinion. But perhaps even more importantly is how laws against gay marriage ultimately exist for no other reason than to deprive same-sex couples of equal rights and benefits. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCGayMrgLaw.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
beings, he would soon cease to exist. Whether social, political, economic, cultural or technological, progression is the driving force behind the positive nature of change. Why, therefore, is
the notion of gay marriage considered so morally offensive that laws must be enacted to prevent it? If there is one thing that reflects mans capacity for progress and
change, it is the tolerance to accept gay marriage as a viable alternative to heterosexual unions; to pass judgment by virtue of legal infiltration is for humanity to inequitably pick
and choose which aspects of contemporary evolution are recognized based upon nothing more substantial than personal opinion. But perhaps even more importantly is how laws against gay marriage ultimately
exist for no other reason than to deprive same-sex couples of equal "rights, benefits, and obligations associated with marriage" (Howenstine, 2006, p. 417). It is hard to fathom that in
the twenty-first century, the otherwise progressive notion of gay marriage is still such a symbol of immorality in a world where corruption and depravity are the cornerstones of many global
societies. Based upon a foundation of love, loyalty and devotion, there is not a single argument that can withstand scrutiny whereby same-sex marriage is accused of being unlike heterosexual
unions apart from the gender. All the moral hypocrites who fuel the controversy by calling for laws against gay nuptials are not doing so with the betterment of humanity
in mind but rather have personal agendas to fulfill at the expense of those who merely want - and deserve - their committed relationships to be legally recognized the same
as their heterosexual counterparts. The implication of the Lawrence [sodomy] case is that we have to find ways of defending heterosexual marriage against the claim, sure to arise, that
...