Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Opposing Economic Views. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 10 page paper looks at two works by authors who support totally different points of view. Free to Choose by Milton and Rose Friedman and Michael Parenti's Democracy for the Few are compared and contrasted. Concepts found in the works, such as social security and taxation are discussed in depth. No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
10 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA044Eco.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Republican or Democrat will be the next leader of the country--and their fears are generally aligned with the party they gravitate towards. For example, Republicans want George W. to win,
not because he is the quintessential presidential candidate but rather because he is aligned with many views they too hold. For example, Republicans want a reduction in taxes as they
believe in the free market and that they should be free to choose. In fact, a book by the name Free To Choose has been published in support of the
free market by noted economist Milton Friedman and his wife Rose. More Libertarian than Republican, the couple supports the view that the people should have more of a say in
their own affairs, and that government should be decidedly smaller. Government should not be able to tell people what to do. Rather, it should be the other way around. And
then there is the other side. There is the view that government should implement more controls and that the poor people in America today exemplify what is wrong with the
country. That is seemingly how Michael Parenti, and others, see the society. Thus, the other view is that the government should not grow smaller. Rather, government programs need to be
developed in order to help those who cannot help themselves. Further, this position suggests that the rich run the country in reality as they own the capital, they donate to
political campaigns and so forth. Nothing can get done if the nation continues to give such people a break. Rather, those who make millions of dollars off of the American
people should give something back and the government should be the administrator that decides who should get what in order to create a fair and just society. Both views have
...