Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on NASA and The Challenger and Columbia Disasters. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 17 page paper uses different frameworks to examine the causes of the Challenger and the Columbia disasters at NASA. The political, symbolic and human resource frames are used, to explain how and why the disasters occurred. The paper then considers the approach that is most suitable for reforming the organization and considers the type of leadership that may be needed. The bibliography cites 10 sources.
Page Count:
17 pages (~225 words per page)
File: TS14_TEchallanger.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
for both incidences can be considered. Using the Bolman and Deal framework (2003), there were for frameworks which can be adopted in order to examine the situation which occurs in
an organization; political, structural, symbolic and the human resource perspective. When looking at the disasters utilizing the political perspective the organization is seen as a government body, this is a
model where the organizational perspective indicates that there are competing values within the organization, and difficult decisions may need to be made regarding the allocation of scarce resources (Bolman and
Deal, 2003). When looking at these characteristics of the political framework and applying them to NASA, there are a number of parallels make this framework very appropriate. The organization is
wombats, although not technically government organization, it is directly reliant on government as a result of the reliance on government funding. Part of the problem may be considered as the
way in which the funding has resulted in the need to determine the way that scarce resources would be allocated. In the political framework the presence of power conflict are
seen as a way of life, always present. Therefore, success is achieved through the way conflict resolution and negotiation takes place (Bolman and Deal, 2003). When applying this firstly to
the Challenger case, the way in which their limited resources was present in culture that ignored the problem of the O-rings. The problem had been noted with the O-rings, and
all the engineers of Thiokol agreed that the O-rings were a weak point, and there was a need for attention. On the day before the launch at a conference took
place, where it was noted that the engineers were in total agreement to due to the cold temperatures the launch of Challenger should be delayed due to the risk of
...