Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Moral Pluralism in the Environment. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages. This paper explains the pros and cons of moral pluralism in the environment. This is based on two issues: endangered species and population control. Can the people agree on these issues? Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_JGAmplur.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Can the people agree on these issues? MORAL PLURALISM Moral pluralism is best described as having several different ways to define the rules for living based on your
understanding of reality (Morgan 1998). ABSTRACT Because of the problems man has created in the environment there are so many endangered species that we cannot begin to
salvage all of them. There are many different theories on what should be done to control the loss of these various species, but how do we come to agree
on one that is the best? "In environmental ethics, pluralism offers the hope of reconciling various rival theories, even if none of them is universally applicable" (Brennan 15, 1992).
This explanation helps us to understand that while there is no single right way to save the endangered species, by agreeing to several different methods that perhaps we can all
come together on solutions that are satisfactory to everybody. This is one of the advantages to moral pluralism. There need not be one single answer that is the
only correct answer. There are many different theories on how to stop the loss of endangered species, but of course no one way is the best way. For
one thing, the variety of the species is one reason there are many different theories; each species could require a different type of handling in order to save it from
extinction. PROS AND CONS The disadvantage of this is that if there are many different solutions put into place to try to save endangered species, how can
all the different groups work together to know who is doing what, and whether these different decisions will work together in harmony with each other? There still has to
...