Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Moral Acceptability of Employers Making Rules Against Dating in the Workplace. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 4 page paper which assesses this position, along with its utilitarian and deontological implications. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: TG15_TGempdate.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Gods moral principles. He simply exists as an independent entity and has the right (and bears the responsibility) of making his own choices as he sees fit. Sartres
philosophy of existentialism contends it is these choices, not any code of morality that ultimately influences the course of an individual life. From this standpoint, naturally, such practices as
dating in the workplace would be a matter of individual choice and not something an employer could prohibit through rules, regulations and corporate policies. The workplace, where an employee
spends at least forty hours per week, would be the natural place to find a date and prospective life partner. This is the ultimate exercise of Sartres free will,
but is it good will or morally the right thing to do? Dating in the workplace has many repercussions not only on the couple that is dating but on
co-workers and the business as well. Back in 1978, cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead labeled such activity an "incest taboo" (Loftus, 1995, p. 34), and declared corporate guidelines were needed
that in which employers state to employees "clearly and unequivocally, You dont make passes at or sleep with the people you work with" (Loftus, 1995, p. 34). The relationships
are too co-dependent and intimate, and once dating and sexuality is introduced to the mix, the moral price everyone eventually pays is too high. Therefore, it is morally acceptable
for an employee to enforce rules against dating in the workplace. According to workforce statistics published in the mid-1990s, about 33 percent of employee dating involved persons who were married
to others (Loftus, 1995). This means that one-third of employees who are exercising free will by dating co-workers are also breaking their marriage vows. Relationships like these never
...