Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Long Lasting Implications for Law Enforcement. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 7 page discussion of this critical Supreme Court case. Heard in 1966, this case has had long lasting implications for law enforcement in terms of apprehension, arrest, and interrogation. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: AM2_PPlwMirn.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
There have been numerous developments in law enforcement that have had long lasting implications in terms of the way that arrests are made and suspects are interrogated.
None, however, have had more importance than the 1966 case of Miranda verses Arizona. In that one critical ruling the face of the interview process as an investigative technique
in law enforcement has been forever changed. Although the Miranda verses Arizona ruling has subsequently been challenged a number of times, it has stood the test of time.
Consequently, law enforcement personnel must be intimately associated with its meaning and the limitations that it has presented. Miranda verses Arizona demonstrates the
systems of checks and balances that have been instituted in our country to protect individual rights. The freedoms and privileges we enjoy in the United States are often attributed
to the type of government which we have in place. We pride ourselves on the fact that this government is devised and functions to have a system of checks
and balances against the concentration of power within the state and national governments (Tannahill and Bedichek, 1991). To provide for a system of checks and balances in the national
government the framers divided the duties of the government into three sections. The first section is the legislative division which is charged with making the laws, the second is
the executive division which enforces the laws passed by the legislative division and the third is the judicial division which interprets the laws passed by the legislative division and determines
if they are legal according to the Constitution (Tannahill and Bedichek, 1991). It was this latter section, the Supreme Court, that was ultimately called on to clarify the circumstances
...