Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Miranda V. Arizona Relation To Organizational Communication. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. Miranda v. Arizona stands as one of the most influential rulings that continue to guide the manner by which today's criminal justice system operates. Created as the result of alleged perpetrators having no idea what to expect in the way of rights during the apprehension and detention process, this case quickly became the barometer of constitutional compliance whereby the criminal suspect being arrested is advised of his or her rights in such context as to have legal representation present (funded either by the individual or through public counsel) and to protect the suspect from any admission whatsoever without first having legal representation. This significant turn of events essentially gave back constitutional protection to suspects who, in earlier days, had little if any ability to seek proper legal guidance without first understanding how and why the Constitution grants them the rights, a clear indication of how this ruling in and of itself is related to organizational communication. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCmirandaaz.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
having no idea what to expect in the way of rights during the apprehension and detention process, this case quickly became the barometer of constitutional compliance whereby the criminal suspect
being arrested is advised of his or her rights in such context as to have legal representation present (funded either by the individual or through public counsel) and to protect
the suspect from any admission whatsoever without first having legal representation. This significant turn of events essentially gave back constitutional protection to suspects who, in earlier days, had little
if any ability to seek proper legal guidance without first understanding how and why the Constitution grants them the rights, a clear indication of how this ruling in and of
itself is related to organizational communication. Prior to the Miranda ruling, there was no universal way for suspects to learn of their rights while being arrested; those who had no
idea what the Constitution provided for their legal protection were left to wallow in their ignorance and ultimately confessed under extreme duress, while those who may have known their legal
rights were not always granted them. In short, law enforcement had no standard in place that would uniformly provide suspects with their constitutional rights prior to taking them into
custody or while interrogating them, a reality that -- had Miranda v. Arizona never come to pass -- would have perpetuated this absence of organizational communication as alleged perpetrators continued
being unfairly and illegally interrogated and convicted. The law, an ever-evolving concept, must uphold the rights of those it seeks to serve.
Whether alleged offender or victim, the legal process is in place as a way to advocate equity inherent of a civilized society. The Supreme Court has been an instrumental
...