Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Miranda V. Arizona: Impact Upon Criminal Procedure Today. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
4 pages in length. Several case decisions have made Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren a household name throughout the latter part of the twentieth century. One that was particularly pertinent to each and every American was Miranda v. Arizona, which ruled that anyone who is considered to be a criminal suspect must be informed of their constitutional rights prior to any legal inquiry. One of the primary purposes of this decision was to offer protection to those who did not have the means by which to obtain counsel; if it was determined the suspect could not afford to hire private counsel, a representative of the court would come to his or her defense. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCMiran.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
that was particularly pertinent to each and every American was Miranda v. Arizona, which ruled that anyone who is considered to be a criminal suspect must be informed of their
constitutional rights prior to any legal inquiry. One of the primary purposes of this decision was to offer protection to those who did not have the means by which
to obtain counsel; if it was determined the suspect could not afford to hire private counsel, a representative of the court would come to his or her defense. Along
the same lines as the Miranda ruling, Mapp v. Ohio was instrumental in protecting the rights of those suspects who were incriminated by illegally obtained evidence. The importance of
these two decisions is clear: the law does not have carte blanche when it comes to invading ones personal privacy or strong-arming suspects for confessions; therefore, they are obligated to
follow strict regulations when it comes to obtaining admissible evidence and questioning a suspect. "Earlier Courts had stressed property rights. Under Warren the emphasis shifted to personal rights,
placing them in a preferred constitutional position" (Anonymous, 1991, p. PG). The controversies that Miranda has caused within the United States poor communities
speak to the ongoing issue of racial divide, with one of the most striking examples being the infamous Rodney King case in Los Angeles, which not only added to the
already raging fire of racism but also incited an aftermath of rioting that served to culminate in death and devastation. The riots ignited after the trials verdict was announced,
sending a strong message to white supremacists everywhere that racial intolerance was not to be warranted. The chain of events the occurred from the initial Los Angeles rioting caused
...