Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Mill and Kant on Moral Freedom:. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 6 page paper discusses the views of Mill and Kant in terms of human freedom. This paper examines how an individual arrives at human freedom and what that means. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_GSMorals.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
time and time again. Indeed, there are no absolutes when addressing such issues and therefore interpretation becomes the highest possible goal. In this regard, both Kant and
Mill are to be commended in that their versions of the "truth" received much attention and acclaim. It is interesting to note that both of these philosophers have had
quite a notable impact on both philosophy and the world in general. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a topic more controversial than to ruminate about the nature of morality
and the higher purpose of human beings. Both Kant and Mill were utilitarian in their outlooks and believed that ultimately the individual held the power of their own fate
within their own hands. In other words, both men believed in a sense in determinism, which states that a certain set of events will happen regardless of individual interference.
Now, while both agreed that the individual had power in their own decision making, in the same regard they viewed this to be inherent to the individual. For example,
Mill believed that the individual would make the right choice for themselves regardless of whether they were guided by positive or negative forces. This is actually quite revolutionary
for a time when people often thought of God as the determining factor in their fate. With philosophers like Kant and Mill saying that people had choices and were
able to negotiate their own decisions, this was rather revolutionary. Furthermore, Kant himself went on to be well-accepted by the church and made many philosophical contributions there.
Both of these men believed that morality rested with the individual and that each person had the moral obligation to make the best decisions
...