Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Militarism in England and India. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 7 page paper provides an overview of the militarism in England and India. This paper considers the origins and purpose. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: MH11_MHMilit3.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
and India suggest a shift in the traditional views of war. At the same time, world wide military spending continues to increase and questions about national security, the capacity
to maintain autonomy in the midst of substantial globalization and the support for conflicting military ideologies in the modern era suggest a different view on militarism. In order to consider
the different views on militarism and impacts for the world community, it is beneficial to consider the force of militarism and the changing views in two separate countries, England and
India. Shared historical elements and the development of post-Cold War perspectives clearly influence assessments of militarism and the challenges faced by countries both preparing for and attempting to avoid
war. Initially, though, it is important to consider the nature of militarism and the social, political and cultural contexts within which this concept was born. What is Militarism?
Though some might argue that militarism is simply an interest in war mongering or in the pursuit of active war, militarism is actually a complex political and cultural concept.
Militarism is a pattern that is culturally defined and that incorporates things like beliefs, behaviors, supporting conditions and institutional expectations (Gilman, 2002). "Militarism applies this belief to intergroup relations,
whether between groups within a society or between societies" (Gilman, 2002). Militarists, then, support the necessity for implementing support for a militaristic ideology based on the belief that force
is legitimate, and necessitate by factors that are predetermined; by God, by history, or by existing ideological differences (Gilman, 2002). There are essentially two different militaristic perspectives:
the enthusiastic militarist and the reluctant militarist. The enthusiastic militarist is one who believes that force is not only legitimate, but necessary and that there are distinct reasons why
...