Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Meeting The Challenges Of Metaphysical And Inductive Skepticism: Weaknesses In Approaches. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. Changing the conception of reality (such as with Plato's conjecture) and loosening the connection between reliability and knowledge (in the case of Descartes) are two ways of meeting the challenges of metaphysical and inductive skepticism. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCIndSkep.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
of Descartes) are two ways of meeting the challenges of metaphysical and inductive skepticism. Identifying the weakness of each of these approaches, the student will want to point out
how the purpose of skepticism is to challenge the principles that cause so much doubtfulness and uncertainty, the preposterousness and contradictions as they exist within myriad philosophical factions. How
even the wisest men like Plato and Descartes have reconsidered the external material world of reality, reliability and knowledge to forever be a limitation of ones faculties is a testament
to the inherent weakness present in even the most seemingly solid argument. Analyzing the weaknesses of reality, reliability and knowledge as they relate to meeting the challenges of metaphysical and
inductive skepticism finds the student considering how the very nature of philosophy is grounded within a foundation of postulation and uncertainty; without the presence of doubt brought about by skepticism,
the fundamental tenets of philosophy would have nothing upon which to be challenged. In essence, metaphysical and inductive skepticism are two of the single-most important facets of philosophy by
virtue of their intrinsic need to question the reality espoused by Plato and reliability/knowledge put forth by Descartes. This system of checks and balances helps to equalize what man
truly knows and that which he thinks he knows - the very foundation for identifying weaknesses - which serves as "forever an inherent aspiration of the thing we know as
human" (Kerr, 1997, p. PG). On the one hand, an individual can readily argue that to exist is, therefore, to be perceived -
that matter does not survive independent of perception. Inasmuch as philosophy is nothing other than the contemplation of wisdom and truth, it can be further surmised how those who
...