Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Medical Testing On Animals. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
10 pages in length. The pros and cons of medical experimentation on animals is a debate that rages hotly between two divided factions: those who claim humanity as a species cannot progress without the medical advancements afforded by animals and the welfare organizations that argue animals should not be seen as tools for man's selfishness. Supporters agree that animals are instrumental in providing an assortment of commodities for their human counterparts that include those supporting man's medical, entertainment, provisions and companion needs. However, despite the varying ways in which they ultimately serve mankind, they argue how history has failed to recognize their right to an existence of their own, having long been looked upon as nothing more than a throwaway product. Bibliography lists 11 sources.
Page Count:
10 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCanmedtest.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
cannot progress without the medical advancements afforded by animals and the welfare organizations that argue animals should not be seen as tools for mans selfishness. Supporters agree that animals
are instrumental in providing an assortment of commodities for their human counterparts that include those supporting mans medical, entertainment, provisions and companion needs. However, despite the varying ways in
which they ultimately serve mankind, they argue how history has failed to recognize their right to an existence of their own, having long been looked upon as nothing more than
a throwaway product. Medical experimentation, claim proponents, is one particular area where animals have given themselves for the sole benefit of mans progress. The primary question put forth
is whether man is taking unfair advantage of his animal counterparts through gross exploitation or if animals are rightly the sacrificial lamb for the more evolved human species. There
is nothing unethical about experiments designed to produce drugs to cure people of illness, nor of garnering public opinion against the needless exploitation and torture of animals. These two
positions are conflicting and every effort should be made to reduce this polarity in order to obtain a balanced and less radical view on animal use in experiments for human
well being (Singh, 2006). II. IN FAVOR OF Michael et al (1994) attempt to sharpen the ever-blurred line between good science and
bad science where animal experimentation is concerned, contending how the public does not comprehend neither the difference of nor the need for certain types of testing arenas, choosing instead to
lump all research laboratories in one common category where animal treatment is concerned. To this, the British researchers place themselves above those they deem as others who, in their
...