Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Media, Nationalism And National Identity Versus New Media (Internet) Theory. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
12 pages in length. The close relationship between media and national identity is a dichotomy of tremendous proportions: On the one hand, it is a union fraught with conflicting messages and images by which to inform the people, yet on the other hand, it reflects one of the most inescapably important relationships ever forged between two otherwise incompatible entities. To illustrate how this incongruous merger has endured – and even flourished – throughout claims of nation state weakening due in part to the pervasiveness of globalization, one need only look as far as the Internet to see how much of a major role media now play in representing, creating and restructuring national identity, nationalism and national boundaries. Bibliography lists 13 sources.
Page Count:
12 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCMedNatlsm.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
a union fraught with conflicting messages and images by which to inform the people, yet on the other hand, it reflects one of the most inescapably important relationships ever forged
between two otherwise incompatible entities. To illustrate how this incongruous merger has endured - and even flourished - throughout claims of nation state weakening due in part to the
pervasiveness of globalization, one need only look as far as the Internet to see how much of a major role media now play in representing, creating and restructuring national identity,
nationalism and national boundaries. II. NATIONALISM AND NATIONAL IDENTITY Nationalism may have originally intended to draw people together, but many believe it has accomplished just the opposite, proving to
pull people apart who would otherwise have no reason to battle. Indeed, it serves to divide what should be a united society. People are forced to observe beliefs
they do not support, making it quite understandable why there are so many states opposed to the blanket concept of nationalism. Critics contend how it has not proven to
embrace the people in the way it may have originally been conceived; rather, it serves to create intensified hostilities among those who were previously amicable. Still others contend that
despite all its past and present global eruptions, nationalism has not been a significant source of strife to the world order or international system; instead, where it poses the greatest
threat is in its desire to dominate powerful states and people. To be sure, nationalism represents different things to different people but for the most part, it has traditionally
affected the world on a state level as opposed to a much broader global scale. For example, Balkan nationalism represents the kind of nationalism that reflects the desire for a
...