Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Martin Luther King/”Letter from a Birmingham Jail”. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page essay that analyzes Martin Luther King’s famous letter. This examination of King’s rhetoric shows how King employed narrative, figurative language and also how he bolstered his opponent’s ethos. No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_khmlkle4.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
fellow clergymen accused King of agitating the public as an unwelcome outsider to their city. The following examination of Kings rhetoric shows how King employed narrative, figurative language and also
how he bolstered his opponents ethos. The letter begins by addressing the clergymen who criticized King, in which King identifies these gentlemen as "men of genuine good will" whose criticism
of him, he realizes, were "sincerely set forth" (King). As such, King indicates that their position deserves a response. Thus, by addressing his opponents ethos in respectful terms, King provides
a context for his remarks that is designed to put his opponents in a receptive and open frame of mind. He then presents a narrative description that serves to introduce
himself and his organization, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). This narrative includes the fact that a Birmingham affiliate specifically asked the SCLC "to be on call" for engagement in
"nonviolent direction action" if such an action was "deemed necessary" (King). This specifically repudiates the accusation that King was acting as an "outside agitator." He is in Birmingham, with members
of his staff, because he "was invited here" (King). However, having established a contemporary rationale for his presence in Birmingham. King cites Pauls ministry, as recounted in the New Testament,
as his overarching rationale, as he is also in Birmingham "because "injustice is here" (King). In analyzing the situation in Birmingham, this portion of Kings narrative once again appeals
to his opponents ethos as he assures t hem that he realizes that they would not be content with superficial analysis that "deals merely with effects and does not
grapple with underlying causes" (King). This rhetorical device not only is conciliatory to his opposition, but by prefacing his remarks with this qualification, not to listen to Kings arguments, rejecting
...