Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Mackie's "The Argument From Queerness". Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. John L. Mackie ascertained that humanity's moral judgments are founded in nothing more than a "mistaken belief in objective value" (p. 94). According to Mackie, if objective moral truth did, indeed, exist, people would then live their lives in accordance to just one moral body of law. However, this is not the case, as all of the planet's people follow many moral codes that remain inconsistent with any other. In actuality, and based upon this argument, there is no such thing as objective moral truths as they exist in the contemporary world. Having addressed these concepts, the philosopher has brought to bear his interpretation of the argument from queerness. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCArgQu.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
if objective moral truth did, indeed, exist, people would then live their lives in accordance to just one moral body of law. However, this is not the case, as
all of the planets people follow many moral codes that remain inconsistent with any other. In actuality, and based upon this argument, there is no such thing as objective
moral truths as they exist in the contemporary world. Having addressed these concepts, the philosopher has brought to bear his interpretation of the argument from queerness.
It is clear that Mackies (1991) analysis tends to lean toward the basis of having no objective values whatsoever, that people mistakenly believe objective values represent
the only available option. Therefore, if objective values are such that they do not exist, then it can be stipulated that there remains no earthly reason for a person
to care about anything. This would imply that Gods word has no value, and there would be no limits placed upon what is tolerated in a civilized society. Objectivism,
which holds an opposing meaning to relativism, claims that there has to be at least one unified moral principle. Unlike relativism, which avoids trying to force the same concept
of right and wrong upon all of the worlds societies, objectivism believes there is considerable merit in bringing together and applying the concept of universal ethics. Mackie (1991), on
the other hand, asserts that there are no objective values. This is not to say, however, that he denies the existence of any values; rather, that there may be
the possibility of subjective values in exchange. It is not his intention to entirely preclude the concept morality, yet he claims that there is no established, worldwide set of
...