Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Machiavelli, More And Aristotle - Social And Political Ideals. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 7 page report discusses and compares the social and political ideals expressed by Sir Thomas More in 'Utopia,' Niccolo Machaivelli in 'The Prince' and Aristotle in 'The Nicomachean Ethics.' No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_Utopeth.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
to better serve the common good of the development of humanity. Social and political ideals for these three philosophers and writers could be determined through the judicious application of certain
sensibilities in conjunction with the wisdom gained through their own experiences. Each is also convinced of the fundamental sensibility of the unique approach he presents. What they share
in common is their certainty of the larger role human nature plays in the smaller picture of government and human society. Each has something to contribute to the contemporary
worlds view of governance and each provides a correlation that can serve modern philosophers and leaders in determining the most realistic approach to be taken regarding human governing as the
world moves into the 21st century. Utopia Sir Thomas Mores "Utopia" (1516) presents what some regard as a carefully considered program, seriously proposed as a
program that could lead to the fundamental reconstruction of human society. Others have determined that "is a complicated joke with tiny spikes and barbs of truth that are designed in
typical Renaissance fashion to both amuse and teach or present a larger message. Most modern philosophical scholars and historians have come to define "Utopia" as falling somewhere in the middle
between both extremes. The fundamental theme of "Utopia" is the determination of the best state for a commonwealth, the best structure
for a society in which man may live with his fellow men and find fulfillment. At the very heart of "is the persistent directive that the most favorable type of
government for a nation, for a commonwealth, cannot succeed as long as people are driven and motivated by their desire for private property. Such self-directed passion must be replaced by
...