Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on MARX:A COMMENTARY ON THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO
. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 10 page paper deals with the basic philosophies of Karl Marx, including class struggle, the exploitation and alienation of the classes, defines bourgeois and proletariat, and provides modern and historical examples for why socialism failed. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
10 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_Mbmarx.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
political and philosophical writings such as Platos Republic and the United States Declaration of Independence. This manifesto would seem to have influenced more than just politics, however, and its basic
tenants can be found in other disciplines such as the arts and humanities, social studies and natural science. One would find it difficult to discuss any major discipline and not
find that Marxism, in some form or fashion, had not had some influence. At one time, its political theories were accepted and utilized by a great deal of the worlds
countries, including such powerhouses as China, Russia and parts of Germany. One of the major reasons The Communist Manifesto and Marxs ideologies were embraced was that at the time in
which it was written there was a marked difference between those who made a living by the sweat of their brow and those who were in positions of authority over
them. These classes Marx divided into basically two groups: the bourgeoisie, or the working middle class, and those in power, or the proletariats. Marx, according to his texts, predicted that
capitalism would destroy itself, if given enough chance to run its course, and the inevitable result would be a freedom from exploitation by the democratic proletariat. It would seem that
the one thing Marx did not account for in his writings was the basic nature of Man. Perhaps he assumed, and maybe he was an optimist, that if given the
choice Man would choose to live in harmony with his fellow Man, neither deigning to rise above the other, but all living on the same leveled playing field. Unfortunately, it
would seem, that for all his knowledge and ideas, he, perhaps, was not a scholar of history. A review of Mans inhumanity to himself, would have maybe brought about yet
...