Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Long-Term Functional Benefits Of Forced Use Vs. Traditional Use Of Involved Extremities In Patients With Cerebral Vascular Accidents. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
8 pages in length. There is much debate within the medical community as to the efficacy of extremity rehabilitation for patients who have suffered a cerebral vascular accident (stroke). While some believe that there is enough scientific evidence to warrant the continued application of rehabilitation techniques, others contend that convincing evidence concerning the therapeutic usefulness of stroke rehabilitation does not yet exist. When the overall consensus is to implement a rehabilitation program, there is still the question of which technique is best: forced or traditional. The writer discusses how proponents of each technique attest to the beneficial outcome of usage; however, there exist a number of variables in making this determination for each individual patient. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
Page Count:
8 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCcereb.wps
Buy This Term Paper »