Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Locke's "Of Identity And Diversity". Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. Locke, who furthers the discourse of Descartes, supports the notion that the mind is wholly distinct from one's body. However, the empiricist manner by which he approaches this perspective is conversely different from Descartes rationalist viewpoint, upholding instead that knowledge is a combination of sensation and reflection rather than any intellectual, tangible quotient. Therefore, the flaw with Locke's position is its inability to be proven beyond the highly interpretive aspect of one's personal thoughts. No bibliography.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCLockePC.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Descartes rationalist viewpoint, upholding instead that knowledge is a combination of sensation and reflection rather than any intellectual, tangible quotient. Therefore, the flaw with Lockes position is its inability
to be proven beyond the highly interpretive aspect of ones personal thoughts. When one speaks about sensory construction of reality, it can readily
be argued that this meaning is attributed to the aftermath of mans action when associated with sensory conduct. The vast importance of this concept truly helps one to effectively
determine what is to be expected in ascertaining the absolute truth about mind/body separation. In essence, Locke gains significant ground by arguing how the distinction between mind and body
must be based upon a foundation of perceptions; however, he loses sight of the tangible nature of establishing ones consciousness. The manner by which all reality is based upon
each individuals perception of what that reality ultimately is. As ones perception progressively moves out of conscious thought, another one is directly behind it to take its place, creating
a perpetual sequence of perception. Two points address the flaw in Lockes position, one that is based solely upon interpretive existence: 1) For
an ordinary physical object (such as a tree) to really exist is for it to exist external to, and independent of the mind; and 2) humans immediately perceive ordinary physical
objects. Sometimes called direct realism, this position defies Lockes conjecture that openly denies the necessary existence of any external material world: Inasmuch as there is no genuine reason for
the external material world to exist, the material world would, therefore, be a useless creation. Locke argues that to be is, therefore, to
...