Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Locke And Rousseau: Differences And Similarities Of Origin And Political Significance Of Private Property. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
6 pages in length. The sociopolitical battle that revolves around the aspect of private property has been an ongoing one throughout the centuries as theorists and laypeople alike have argued the benefits and drawbacks to permitting the common people to possess property apart from governmental influence. Two of the most outspoken opinions come from Locke and Rousseau, a duality that while sharing some common ground also illustrates the division between both sides of the issue. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCLockeRouss.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
laypeople alike have argued the benefits and drawbacks to permitting the common people to possess property apart from governmental influence. Two of the most outspoken opinions come from Locke
and Rousseau, a duality that while sharing some common ground in a fundamental sense also illustrates the division between both sides of the issue. The fundamental basis of Lockes viewpoint
revolves around the notion of private property and the natural rights that inherently accompany such ownership. Within the realm of life exists inherent elements to ones existence; paramount to
mans existence is the concept of natural rights. Philosophers have long postulated what, exactly, these rights consist of within the massive scope of mortality, with some contending that natural
rights are those that are without social infiltration, while others attest to the fact that natural rights are doled out only by social status. "Every man," according to Locke (1988),
"has a property in his own person" (p. 101). By comparison, Rousseau - considered a front-runner of modern socialism - was one of
the first modern writers to seriously attack the institution of private property, and therefore is considered a forebear of Communism as well. He questioned the assumption that the will
of the majority is always the correct one, and he argued that the goal of government should be to secure freedom, equality, and justice for all within the state, regardless
of the will of the majority. One of the most important principles of Rousseaus inequality as it related to this end is that politics and morality should not be
separated. Rousseau felt that when a state fails to act in a moral fashion, it ceases to function in the proper manner and ceases to exert genuine authority over
...