Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Lobbying Influence On Presidential Elections. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
8 pages in length. From the strong-arm tactics of political machines of the late nineteenth century to the power-in-numbers approach of contemporary special interest groups, lobbyists have a long history of influencing presidential elections. Whether right or wrong, this influence has long been the cause of great concern over the detrimental impact upon the democratic process, as well as the catalyst for some much-needed social improvements through what can be called a network of influences that illustrate how 'the infrastructure of the network society is unfolding before us' (Tambini PG). Annotated bibliography lists 12 sources.
Page Count:
8 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCLobbyPrez.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Whether right or wrong, this influence has long been the cause of great concern over the detrimental impact upon the democratic process, as well as the catalyst for some
much-needed social improvements through what can be called a network of influences that illustrate how "the infrastructure of the network society is unfolding before us" (Tambini PG). Political contributions due
to lobbyist influence were getting out of hand, at which point a law was enacted in 1974 in order to offset the notion of dirty politics by removing the one
entity that played the most integral role: money. In short, campaign financing had reached an all-time high with regard to the process of exploitation. It was determined that
in order to set a precedence of fairness and equality for all, there needed to be some sort of limit set on the amount of campaign contributions allowed by any
single individual. However, according to Laura W. Murphy, director of the New York City-based American Civil Liberties Unions Washington office, clever lobbyists were - and still are today -
able to easily find their collective way around the law in order to raise exorbitant amounts of money from "less accountable areas, such as soft money and issue advocacy" (Newlin
Carney 337). However, pro-reform activist groups are adamant about the issue of raising the limit, inasmuch as they see it as a continual progression of political deterioration. It is
their opinion that if restrictions are relaxed, it will only open the door that much wider for large donors to overtake and paralyze the entire political campaign process through lobbyist
influence. "...It will mean that contributions from ordinary citizens are a smaller and smaller percentage of the money that candidates are raising--and ordinary Americans will have a smaller and
...