Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Lewis V. City Of Chicago Revisited. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. As the fictitious president of the Society of Human Resource Management, the writer composes a brief response to the inequitable nature of how Lewis v. Chicago has heretofore been addressed by the court of appeals. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLClewisvchic.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
-- chance as their white counterparts. There have been times, however, when an underqualified minority wins out over a qualified white male just to meet the necessary quota, the
reasoning behind which was that other races were viewed as getting the short end of the stick if they had to compete against Caucasians. Lewis v. Chicago brings an
entirely new twist to the already-convoluted facets of affirmative action by prohibiting black firefighters from waging a legal fight against an outright wrongdoing because of inaccurately perceived statute of limitations.
To look back at the original objective of affirmative action tenets is to understand how it was meant to use legal support as a means of empowerment for minority
groups who struggle to meet broad-brush educationally-related employment qualifications. However, history has clearly demonstrated that affirmative actions quest to equalize those groups has instead allowed for legalized prejudicial practices
against the very populations it sought to serve. Because the vast similarities to Ricci v. DeStefano, the implications this case will have upon
human resource policies are such that policy must now reflect a number of additional considerations, not the least of which includes private employers must abide by the decision; the testing
process that leads to new hires will change permanently; there is no concrete assurance that diversity and affirmative action programs will remain in tact; layoffs and terminations hinge precariously upon
disparate impact analyses; and this law will likely become an ever-changing ideology (Five Things Employers Can Learn). Viable solutions to deep-rooted social problems
often come with a pretty high price tag where compromise is concerned; where two or more sides of a given issue are incapable of working out the situation for everyones
...