Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Letter to the White House. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 2 page paper is a letter of opinion written to the President, which questions the reasons for the war in Iraq. This paper argues that the President should question the reasons for the war in light of the inability to locate weapons of mass destruction.
Page Count:
2 pages (~225 words per page)
File: MH11_MHIraLe3.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
In recent years, the question of Iraqs role in the Middle East, including their participation in the first Gulf War and their subsequent protection of anti-American forces in this region
of the world has resulted in the implementation of American and UN directed sanctions. Though there were arguments both for and against the use of sanctions in the Middle
East, the elements that led to the second Gulf War, including the acknowledgement of weapons of mass destruction and the problems that have arisen since the September 11 World
Trade Center tragedy determined some of the actions taken by members of your cabinet. While there has been considerably support for your choice to enter into war
without the support of the United Nations, critics have argued that your interests are purely economic, and your choice of war came at a time when your approval rating in
the United States was at an all time low. Some say that your decision to go to war extended from your belief that a victory against Saddam Hussein, and
the discovery of weapons of mass destruction, will serve your presidency and improve the economic and social condition of the Bush regime. These critics have used some of
the historical context of the second Gulf War to support their arguments. Since the end of World War II, US defense and foreign policy have been based on the
assertion of the USs superpower status and the ability to separate the country from other countries based on our defense capabilities. National security has been maintained not by the
waging of war, but by the ability to wage war; not necessarily by the demonstration of our defense capabilities, but by the visibility of the threat of our defense capabilities.
...