Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Lenz's Luxuries in Prison (Article Review). Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper examines this article that includes a study. The statistical significance of the findings are evaluated. The article focuses on public opinion and desires in respect to prison systems and the amenities they provide. No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA346Len.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Lenz (2002) reports on this very interesting topic, where he introduces the notion that the general public is not really adept at evaluating prison systems, but they nevertheless voice
their opinions. The sense that the public does not want amenities to be provided in prisons is illustrated as well as the fact that it becomes a political issue quite
often. The public actually sees stripping the prisons of things like television and weight rooms as having a deterrent effect. It will make prison life less attractive. Yet,
the author takes the reader through prison systems and suggests they are by no means luxurious. The gist of the authors argument is that politicians use prison systems for their
own purposes and spout misinformation to a jaded public. The truth is that prison systems are not luxurious and that taking away the things they have provides no benefit and
actually can be detrimental. These "amenities" serve to keep prisoners occupied. The author conducts research and reports that it is not true that all people do not support the amenities
per se, but they do not want to pay for them. In other words, if the amenities like air conditioning and cable television were free of charge, then the public
might think they are practical tools for managing inmates. The research strategy used in the course of this article is suitable but has its limitations. For example, the author claims
that the general public supports amenities but does not want to foot the bill may be true, and the strength of the technique is that it provides current thinking on
the issue. Yet, the strategy fails to probe further into the dilemma regarding the connection between amenities and deterrence, as that is a good argument as well. Statistical
...