Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Legality Of The UN Security Council's Actions Against Terrorism. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
4 pages in length. The extent to which a comprehensive approach toward the ever-present threat of terrorist activity is necessary is both grand and far-reaching; that the UN Security Council's actions against terrorism have proven legally questionable, however, speaks to the application of Resolution 1441 to justify 'all necessary means' and the notion of human rights. Bibliography lists 9 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCUNSecCo.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
proven legally questionable (Anonymous, 2001), however, speaks to the application of Resolution 1441 to justify all necessary means and the notion of human rights. If there is any question as
to legality of the UN Security Councils attack upon Iraq - and there has been tremendous uncertainty regarding this aspect - Resolution 1441 of the United Nations Charter fully supports
this action as both legal and warranted. By virtue of Article 24 of the United Nations Charter granting powers of responsibility in relation to international peace, the Security Council
was fully within its legal rights to take action against Iraq by all means necessary. Moreover, any member state maintains the same ability as the Security Council to impose
whatever means necessary to uphold and implement past UNSC resolution. "Therefore, the Security Councils interpretation and application of all necessary means provides a vital context prior to the US
led invasion of Iraq" (Pappas, 2004). Two specific criteria must be met in order to pass the UNs legal scrutiny where all necessary means is concerned: 1. Iraq
was in material breach of one or more UN Security Council Resolutions to disarm weapons of mass destruction. 2. Whether the UN provides any specific reference to the use of
"any means necessary" to uphold UN resolutions with respect to Iraq (Pappas, 2004). According to Resolution 1441, requirement number one was wholly
satisfied due to Iraqs perpetual breach of obligation, most specifically with regard to its defiance toward cooperating with the IAEA and UN inspectors. The Security Councils legal justification for
the second test is supported by UN resolutions that provide for member states to have the power to use all necessary means. As such, the historical application of Resolution
...