Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Legal Case Briefs. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 25 page document that contains short legal briefs on the following cases: Abrams v. US; Barron v. City of Baltimore; Brown v. Board of Education; Buckley v. Valeo; Cantwell v. State of Connecticut; Da Jonge v. Oregon; Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire; Dred Scot v. Sanford; Engel v. Vitale; Everson v. Board of Education; Francis v. Resweber; Gitlow v. US; Griswold v. Connecticut; Mapp v. Ohio; Marbury v. Madison; McCollum v. Board of Education; Minersville School District v. Gobitis; N.Y. Times v. US; National Socialist Party v. Village of Skokie; Near v. Minnesota; Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart; Palko v. Connecticut; Plessy v. Ferguson; Roe v. Wade; Schenck v. US; University of California v. Bakke; Weeks v. US; Wolf v. Colorado; and Worcester v. State of Georgia. These briefs are available in whole or in parts. Please email us for more information if you would like to purchase one or more individual briefs.
Page Count:
25 pages (~225 words per page)
File: KE9_99brfs29.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Constitution. The facts of the case concerned William Marbury, Dennis Ramsay, Robert Townsend Hooe, and William Harper, who?during the December term of 1801?were nominated as applicants to the Senate
and consent was granted that they be appointed as justices of the peace for the District of Columbia. In due course, the commissions were signed by the president at that
time (Adams). While James Madison, the Secretary of State, affixed the seal of the United States to the commission, he did not
delivery them. Madison was petitioned by the men to deliver their commissions, but he did not comply with the request. The question before the court was whether or not the
Supreme Court of the U.S. could award a writ of mandamus, and other crucial questions concerning the power of the court were decided as well. The court ruled that
in signing the commission of Marbury, the president of the United States and that all necessary steps for making this appointment a legal fact were completed. Having legal title to
the office, the court ruled that he had a subsequent right to the commission, and that refusal to deliver the commission was in violation of that right. In making this
ruling the court established the parameters on which subsequent jurisdiction could be based. Barron v. City of Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243 The constitutional issue in this case concerns a
clause in the Fifth Amendment that prohibits the taking of private property for public use, without providing just compensation. The plaintiff argued that this principle applies because the city
of Baltimore caused the water around his wharf to be too shallow for commercial use. The plaintiff contends that the Fifth Amendment protection extends to the legislative power of
...