Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Legal Advice to Adult Entertainment TV Station. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 6 page research paper that is based on the premise that this research is a formal statement of advice for an adult-entertainment TV station from its legal counsel. The writer reviews current First Amendment case law and argues that the station should take steps to limit access to minors, as well as censor any material that depicts illegal acts or is demeaning to women or minority members. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_khxtvleg.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
is undoubtedly no area of law where the Supreme Courts interpretation of First Amendment rights has been vaguer than those cases that concern public displays of sexual behavior or suggestive
behavior. Nevertheless, certain distinctive trends in First Amendment law and sexual content are evident. First of all, as Adler (2001) points out, the Supreme Court has embarked in entirely
new direction in regards to First Amendment rights due to the advent and public recognition of child pornography. In its initial struggles over interpreting First Amendment rights, the Court rejected
the idea that speech can be banned on the rationale that it might initiate dangerous or illegal ideas (Adler, 2001). In child pornography cases, the Court has begun to
reverse this stance and has allowed for the "categorization and regulation of speech" based on how individuals might react to the content of specific broadcast (Adler, 2001). As this suggests,
the Court has permitted the government to restrict the realm of fantasy, which was formerly protected under the First Amendment. Therefore, first of all, it is recommended that
all material shown on this station should be pre-screened prior to broadcast. Any content that depicts illegal activities, such as sexually oriented behavior involving children or depictions of rape should
be censored and deleted as it could be argued in court that such depictions had a significant influence that prompted the commission of an illegal act. As to other
depictions of sexual behavior, the law can be very vague. Cole (1994) argues that the peculiar relationship that exists between the law and sexual expression is best exemplified by the
case of Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., which upheld an Indiana statute that demanded that nude female dancers should wear pasties and G-strings. While this "clothing" does little to obscure
...