Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Leadership theories Do Not Necessarily Predict Effective Leadership. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
8 pages in length. The basis upon which effective leaders are empowered does not always equate with placing the right person in the position; in fact, the extent to which leadership theories merely provide an outline of what is expected of a good leader is both grand and far-reaching. Just as a simple job description only scratches the surface of finding the right employee, the overall impact of a leader cannot be solely hinged upon the oft-inadequate specifics of leadership theories. Anyone can follow the guidelines of a given leadership theory and carry out the compulsory specifications, however, there are myriad more innate qualifications to effective leadership than what can either be taught from or redeemed by a simple list of qualifications. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
Page Count:
8 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCLeadrTheor.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
provide an outline of what is expected of a good leader is both grand and far-reaching. Just as a simple job description only scratches the surface of finding the
right employee, the overall impact of a leader cannot be solely hinged upon the oft-inadequate specifics of leadership theories. Anyone can follow the guidelines of a given leadership theory
and carry out the compulsory specifications, however, there are myriad more innate qualifications to effective leadership than what can either be taught from or redeemed by a simple list of
qualifications. II. THEORIES AND LEADERS Determining what it takes to become a good leader - receptively influential, compassionate, communicative, dynamic - has long been up for debate between/among those
who support various theories. Two of the most examined theories, which call upon the inherent - and perhaps even genetic - aspects of leadership qualification - are the Great
Man and Trait theories. The former relies upon a patriarchal disposition, while the latter draws from a viewpoint of such characteristics being inborn. Both theories conclude that leadership
ability is born not made; however, the Great Man theory presumes this is acquired from family pedigree, while the Trait theory assigns a number of commonly shared characteristics that indicate
a more heritable aptitude toward capable leadership. As the name implies, the Great Man theory is devoid of any gender consideration, instead basing
its entire concept upon the notion that the only viable candidate for leadership of any kind is - and has always been - male (Northouse, 2003). The presumption has
long been put forth that leadership is causally related to organizational performance; with this in mind, one would automatically surmise that without effective leadership, organizational performance would cease to exist.
...