Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Leadership Journal. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 6 page paper is an example of how a student may keep a journal looking at their own leadership styles and skills to assess strengths and areas of potential improvement. The paper uses examples of self examination used to compare events to leadership theories. The bibliography cites 4 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: TS14_TEjorlead.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
as strengths or improvement areas are noted. The student will create their own diary and notes, this paper gives an idea the way they may be achieved. Journal Entry
1 When considering the way a student may have strengths or areas of improvement of leadership then there ahs to be a foundation for the judgment on which leadership skills
and characteristics are judged. However, it is also worth noting there may not be any single fully inclusive definition of what makes a leader, furthermore various characteristics may work in
divergent ways for the different leaders. Before looking at oneself literature may be referenced. Peter Drucker offers an insight to leadership in the late twentieth century and their required
qualities. He states that a leader can not be defined by present personality types (a theory which was at loggerheads to scientific management techniques). The main trait he believes is
that a leader has followers, sets examples, has responsibilities and therefore will get results (Drucker in Hesselbein et al, 1997). He further goes on to recognise that a leader will
usually submit themselves to a mirror test, continually judging themselves, asking is the person they see in the mirror every morning the person they want to be (Drucker in Hesselbein
et al, 1997). Charles Handy, another recognised management Guru cites the short-sightedness of todays management, with a constant preoccupation with the enrichment of the shareholders (Hesselbein et al, 1997). He
argues that whilst businesses dont have a greater goal or cause then it will not see any remarkable leaders, with management remaining in mediocrity (Hesselbein et al, 1997). However it
is not only the characteristics and personalities of leaders that are changing, it is the styles and techniques they use, and the organisational set up in which the leader leads.
...