Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Kodak Eastman - Cash Flow Analysis 2005 - 2007. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 4 page paper examined the Kodak Eastman cash flow statements for the financial years 2005 – 2007. The analysis looks at the areas of concern, trends that are seen and positive aspects of the statements. The bibliography cites 4 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: TS14_TEkodakcash.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Kodak between 2005 and 2007 there was a period of transition when the firm was undertaking significant structural changes. This can be seen when looking at the cash flows of
the firm in the cash flow statement. There were a number of discontinued operations; these were a significant source of income to the firm during this difficult time. These were
$4461 in 2005 and $227 in 2006, accounting for 11% and 11.3% of cash inflows respectively. In 2007 this increased significantly as the restructuring was completed, the cash inflow of
$2,456 accounted for 71.8% of the cash inflows that year. Therefore, over the three year period there is a total cash inflow of $3,129 originating from the discontinued operations.
There were also some losses that were theoretical losses, incurred as a result of changes in accounting policies. The 2005 figures for the cumulative losses occurring as a result of
accounting change amounted to $57. This can be added to the loss from continuing operations in that year of $1,712, to give a full paper loss of $1,769.
When looking at the cash flow statement in more detail in order to assess the firm there are some areas which an investor may find of concern. The first and
most notable issue is the ongoing loss created by the ongoing operations. Knowing the firm is undergoing a major shift in terms of focus of operations and markets is important
when looking at these figures as all three years demonstrate a loss on the continuing operations. The level of the loss is
decreasing each year, with the 2006 loss of $804 being a 53.3% improvement on the 2005 figure of ?1,712. In 2007 there was further improvement; losses from ongoing operations were
...