Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Kantianism Versus Utilitarianism. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 5 page paper presents arguments for each of the positions but supports utilitarianism. A contemporary example (Miami International Airport shooting) is provided to examine the theories.
Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA549KaU.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
it exists as a given. It is not subject to interpretation nor is it something that is learned through life. The idea that all knowledge is leaned is negated by
this premise. Instead, knowledge exists in the world and is there for the taking. Good will is also something pertinent. Good will is in and of itself intrinsically valuable (Kant,
1964). Kant (1964) also suggests that for moralitys sake, laws should be obeyed. Kants (1964) categorical imperative is also discussed in his work entitled Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals.
The categorical imperative is something that states that one should act only on what maxims one can will to be a universal law (Honderich, 1995). It should be noted
that maxims are rules that agents use, or base their actions upon, and they are further, principles of form (Honderich, 1995). The categorical imperative tests maxims through the prescription
of a thought experiment where one asks oneself whether or not one could consistently will ones maxim as a universal law (Honderich, 1995). In other words, if people live by
their own rules--always tell the truth, take the garbage out every night, brush your teeth after every meal--can these be thought of as universal laws? Clearly, they can sometimes, but
other times they would not be thought of in such a manner. John Stuart Mill on the other hand, in his Utilitarianism, makes quite a different case as it respects
morality. In the book, the author begins the chapter "What Utilitarianism Is" in this manner: "A passing remark is all that needs be given to the ignorant blunder of supposing
that those who stand up for utility as the test of right and wrong use the term in that restricted and merely colloquial sense in which utility is opposed to
...