Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Kant And Sartre: Modern Philosophy Is Marked By A Spirit Of Man As Artist. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
4 pages in length. The writer briefly discusses Kant and Sartre with regard to a priori, human classifications and freedom. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCKantSart.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
fundamental differences between analytic and synthetic judgments. Analytic judgments, which are those "whose predicates are wholly contained in their subjects" (Kemerling, 2001), are such because they do not stimulate
or enhance subject conceptualization; rather, they are nothing more than "purely explicative" (Kemerling, 2001) in nature and can be logically reasoned based upon the principle of non-contradiction. By contrast,
synthetic judgments uphold predicates that are "wholly distinct from their subjects, to which they must be shown to relate because of some real connection external to the concepts themselves" (Kemerling,
2001). Therefore, the primary separation between synthetic and analytic judgments is that synthetics might be "genuinely informative" (Kemerling, 2001) but at the same time obligate justification by an external
principle. Primary to Kantian defense of aesthetic judgments of taste claiming synthetic a priori status is the concept of human beings being more
than just stimulus-response machines; as such, he long frowned upon the stringency of scientific requirements, belaboring the fact that the stringent community typically adopted a reductionist approach when it came
to issues of variability. It was his contention that science maintained a strict and finite view of things that he perceived to have an otherwise broad range and potentiality;
however, these aspects were often squelched by a need for systematic control. According to Sartre, humanity is comprised of three distinct types of
being: L?tre-en-soi (Being-in-itself); L?tre-pour-soi (Being-for-itself); and L?tre-pour-autrui (Being-for-others). Understanding the difference between and among these classifications allows one to readily accept this new view of reality. The external
world is the ruling force behind the presence of all beings, however, Sartre argued that mankinds egoism prevents him from relating mutually to modern philosophy as being marked by a
...