Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Judges, Level of Effectiveness. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 4 page research paper addresses topics that relate to judges, describing the responsibilities of judges and also their effectiveness and ineffectiveness. The writer describes an ineffective and an effective justice of the Supreme Court. Bibliography lists 5 sources
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: KL9_khjudgesre.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
listed below. Citation styles constantly change, and these examples may not contain the most recent updates. Judges, Level of Effectiveness Research Compiled for The
Paper Store, Enterprises Inc. By - properly! While Supreme Court Justices are the
prominent and well-known judges in the criminal justice system of the United States, they are not precisely typical, as few judges are assisted by a team of clerks and get
a yearly vacation from July through September; however, there are still common features shared by all American judges and this is primarily the expectation that their decisions will be just
(Gaines and Miller, 2010). Responsibilities of judges: Judges are responsible for a wide variety of tasks (Meyer and Grant, 2003). The
role of referee during trial and their administration of sentences are the responsibilities of which the public is most aware; however, it is also through that judges are responsible for
decisions that affect points throughout criminal or civil proceedings (Meyer and Grant, 2003). For example, judges "Sign search or arrest warrants; Alter arrest procedures through appellate rulings; Set and/or revoke
bail," as well as a myriad of other duties, such as hearing "pre-trial motions" or approving "plea bargains" (Meyer and Grant, 2003, p. 175).
Since the 1970s, federal courts and many of the state courts have encouraged trial judges to inform jurors of "possible mistakes and misinterpretations of eyewitnesses" (Greene, et
al, 2007, p. 146). The Supreme Court, in Neil v. Biggers, specified five conditions that jurors should take into consideration in their evaluation of evidence (Greene, et al, 2007). However,
...