Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 5 page paper that describes Mill's presentation of the principles of Utilitarianism, but also demonstrates Mill's particular concern for the essential nature of man's intellect. This paper recognizes the importance of Mill's considerations on a societal level as well as recognizing the personal considerations of each man. Bibliography includes 1 source.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_Utilitarianism.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
of the intellect and pleasure of sensation significantly impact the effects in terms of the its major premises. The concept of Utilitarianism put forth by a number of philosophers, including
Mills own father, represents a doctrine of simplicity, with little regard for the complexity of human interaction. Mill described the principle of Utility in terms of human behavior, stating
that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness" (Mill 7). Happiness, in the context of
Mills description, was not simply elated feelings, but more concretely the pleasure derived in relation to the absence of pain. In support of Utility, pleasure and the absence of
pain are the only two things that truly matter--mans actions should directly relate to the achievement of these two ends (Mill 7). One of the basic issues that
Mill supports in his redefining of Utilitarianism is the recognition that pleasure can be achieved on a number of different levels, and that man can clearly derive it from means
other than simple sensation. Rather than considering sensation and physical pleasure as the primary essence of Utilitarianism (not to suggest this is the relationship promoted by James Mill and
others), Mill recognized that mans relationship of the benefits of his actions necessarily related to the ability to weigh the positives against the negatives. Man is capable of perceiving
differences in valuation of pleasure through the process of weighing the positive and negative repercussions of each action. At the same time, Mills argument also supports the fact that
the differing types of pleasure can also have delineated preferences for each individual. "Of two pleasures, if there be one to which all or almost all who have experience
...