Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on John Sack/Inside the Bunker. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page essay that summarizes and records the writer's reactions to John Sack's essay "Inside the Bunker." In this essay, Sack discusses the philosophy of people who deny that the Holocaust happened. The writer argues that Sack's principal thesis is that hate begets hate and that it is only through abdicating hate that people can move forward and prevent more events similar to the Holocaust. No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_khsack.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
had previously demonized -- the Holocaust revisionists who deny that the Nazis instituted genocidal policies against European Jews. Sacks principal thesis is that hate begets hate and that it is
only through abdicating hate that people can move forward and prevent more events similar to the Holocaust. Sack realizes that it is this belief that ties him to the Holocaust
revisionists and allows him to perceive this group of people with understanding. Sack records how he was surprised and intrigued when he received an invitation to speak at an
international convention of Holocaust revisionists. He accepts the invitation in order to get an insiders look at what makes these people tick, that is, at how they could ignore the
testimony of thousands of witnesses to the Nazi atrocities. His reactions to these people surprised him. He writes, "The last thing he expected was to like them" (280). First
of all, Sack explains how the Holocaust revisionist philosophy works. He was rather surprised to find out that they do not deny that thousands of Jews died due to unsanitary
conditions, starvation, neglect and disease. They do not deny that Hitler and the Nazis hated the Jews and other peoples whom they considered to be inferior. The point that the
Holocaust revisionists argue is that there was a specifically designed genocidal policy enacted by the Germany government. Sack goes over their objections and effectively refutes their arguments, but this
is not the main point to his essay. What strikes Sack most profoundly is that these people simply do not wish to believe that the culture that gave the world
Beethoven and Bach could also have instituted such evil. Sack was profoundly surprised that these people did not voice anti-Semitic sentiments, but rather argued against hate. This caused Sack
...