Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on John Rawls, Justice & Affirmative Action. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 6 page research paper that explores issues of economic distributive justice. Throughout its history, human societies have addressed issues of justice. While it is agreed that societies should be just, precisely what this means has been a matter of much debate. A particularly contentious sub-category of this argument has been in regards as to what constitutes economic justice, that is, "the proper distribution of social benefits and burdens" (Shaw and Barry, 2004, p. 105). In this regard, a variety of rival principles have been proposed. Examination of these various theories shows that the "Theory of Justice" outlined by John Rawls offers a comprehensive and fair framework for distributive economic justice. This is particularly evident when examined in light of affirmative action and equal employment opportunities. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_khjraa.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
matter of much debate. A particularly contentious sub-category of this argument has been in regards as to what constitutes economic justice, that is, "the proper distribution of social benefits and
burdens" (Shaw and Barry, 2004, p. 105). In this regard, a variety of rival principles have been proposed. Examination of these various theories shows that the "Theory of Justice" outlined
by John Rawls offers a comprehensive and fair framework for distributive economic justice. This is particularly evident when examined in light of affirmative action and equal employment opportunities. Rival
theories The utilitarian approach to economic justice is to argue that an economic system chosen by a given society should bring "more good to society than any other system" (Shaw
and Barry, 2004, p. 107). As to what system that might be, Utilitarianism provides no answer. Libertarians place a premium on liberty above all other considerations. They believe that each
person should be able to "live as he or she pleases, free from interference of others" as long as their freedom does not impinge on anyone elses (Shaw and Barry,
2004, p. 109). Whereas, utilitarians are willing to restrict liberty if, by doing so, they promote the greater good, libertarians feel that this is wrong (Shaw and Barry, 2004). Robert
Nozicks Theory of Justice presents a strong argument for the libertarian view. This view honors property rights, that is, that individuals have a right to the products of their labor
and that they can legitimately transfer those holdings to others or receive from others. This "entitlement theory" holds that the economic distribution of goods is just if individuals acquired their
goods by the means he describes, regardless of whether or not makes for any inequalities in the distribution of goods (Shaw and Barry, 2004). According to this philosophy, someone who
...