Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on John Locke's "A Letter Concerning Toleration" - Defining Toleration. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. To understand toleration as Locke intended is to realize its inherent relation to possessing conscience. His 1689 paper entitled "A Letter Concerning Toleration" set a significant precedent with regard to how toleration, in and of itself, is not solely connected with propriety, but rather holds more of an impact upon concerns of political morality. Insofar as one might consider this approach to be somewhat of a limitation upon the notion of toleration, it actually represents a broader perspective of the term that incorporates pertinent principles of one's existence: civic virtue, religion and political morality. No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCLockeT.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
to how toleration, in and of itself, is not solely connected with propriety, but rather holds more of an impact upon concerns of political morality. Insofar as one might
consider this approach to be somewhat of a limitation upon the notion of toleration, it actually represents a broader perspective of the term that incorporates pertinent principles of ones existence:
civic virtue, religion and political morality. One area of society where Lockes impression of toleration was particularly pertinent was within the religious communities of the 1670s, where clemency was as
foreign a concept as accepting the fact there is more than one way to worship. One might readily surmise how Lockes
impact upon morally minded citizens of the time was based upon the fundamental concepts of ethical relativism and ethical objectivism. Given the fact that all of humanity must coexist
on the same planet, Locke stressed how there has to be some modicum of consideration with regard to religious, political and civic morality as it relates to toleration; if not,
then there would be no sense of altruism or respect for individual life. Indeed, people have to abide by an ethical code in order to ensure proper behavior among
the worlds population, yet, Lockes critics asked who is to determine what this ethical code will represent, and who is to say that all cultures and communities must follow it?
If objective moral truth does indeed exist, Locke postulated, then people would then live their lives in accordance to just one moral body of toleration. However, this is
not the case, inasmuch as all of the worlds inhabitants follow many religious, political and civic codes that remain inconsistent with any other, ultimately serving to separate the very essence
...