Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on James Madison’s Views on ‘Tyranny of the Majority’ in “Federalist #10”:. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
In three pages this paper examines how Madison addresses this issue in “Federalist #10,” specifically how such majority tyranny can be contained, and how political freedom has been affected as a result. No additional sources are listed in the bibliography.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: TG15_TGtyrmajor.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
was a topic that required more than philosophical contemplation. When developing a new republic, a plan of action to squelch the possibility of tyranny of the majority was needed.
This was what James Madison attempted to achieve in his famous contribution to The Federalist Papers entitled "Federalist No. 10." Madison believed that tyranny of the majority -
or the possibility that the control of a majority could overtake the rights of the individual - was a legitimate threat to any democratic form of government. In "Federalist #10,"
James Madison traces the problems to the negative impacts factions can have on society. According to Madison, a faction consists of "a number of citizens, whether amounting to a
majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the
permanent and aggregate interests of the community" (41). Any faction that gains a large number of citizen supporters will, naturally, wield more political and social power than those smaller
factions. Madison observes that a majority can compromise a democratic government because its powerful status can only be preserved by the oppression of minorities. He explains, "When a
majority is included in a faction, the form of popular government on the other hand enables it to sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest, both the public good and
the rights of other citizens" (Madison 43). According to Madison, a tyranny of the majority can have violent consequences, and therefore it must be curtailed by constraining the liberties prevailing
factions can enjoy, which would limit their power, influence, and actions. However, he offers no means by which to accomplish this objective. Madison also suggests that a small
...