Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Issues in a Hypothetical Connecticut Case. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page paper identifying issues in a hypothetical case, listing and then discussing those issues. Issues address right to privacy; patent application requirements; insider trading; and government budgeting. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: CC6_KSgovtCTcase.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
provisions for funding. Consultation with the budget is one of the first steps that the president should have made. It is within
the presidents power to create a new agency, or to direct an existing bureau to add specific, targeted services for the public good. Before making any announcement or plans
to proceed with the creation of a new agency, however, he must first determine funding sources. The nebulous category of "taxes" is not sufficient. The president will need
to actively move available funds from one or more existing budgets into an account for this new agency. The total amount that the president is able to spend on
the government is approved and sanctioned by Congress, and the president is not at liberty to obligate the government in the manner he has in creating this new agency without
forethought. 2. Retinal scanning as national security policy. The Constitution provides a guarantee that American citizens will not be subject to unusual search and
seizure without good cause. It can be argued that the interests of national security does constitute cause, but the argument likely will be rejected. Rather, the argument supporting
the individuals right to privacy is the one that will take precedence. Requiring retina scanning as a matter of course would be comparable to requiring full fingerprinting as a
requirement for buying groceries. 3. National database of personal information. This provision violates every facet of the right to privacy. "The US Supreme
Court ruled in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) that the right to privacy has a constitutional foundation that can be found within the penumbras of the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth and
...