Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Is Marxism Scientific?. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper asks that questions and answers in the affirmative. Historical materialism is discussed. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA416sci.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
complex and hierarchical like historical materialism. The theorists work that focuses primarily on this concept is Contribution of the Critique of Political Economy which was published in 1859 (McLeish,
1993). The core belief to come from the book is that progress is made in human history, which is characterized by the humans tendency to try to master nature and
accumulate technological capacities (1993). This idea has actually been played out in ways greater than perhaps Marx had ever imagined. Today, the world is inundated with technological achievement. Just a
few decades ago, no one could fathom a world where cellular phones and portable computers were accessible to all. In addition to the point he makes about technology, there are
other components of the theory. Marx also held that methods of organizing work, and the political belief systems which go along with them, will persist as long as technological progress
is encouraged (McLeish, 1993). According to Marx and Engels, five progressive modes of production have always existed and these may be also thought of as forms of governmental control. These
ranged all the way from slavehood to feudalism to capitalism and then would later progress to socialism and communism (1993). There is much within the context of Marxs argument that
is related to science. His emphasis on technology as well as his theory of historical materialism specifically do point to something that is characteristic of scientific inquiry. On the other
hand, one can easily see that his work is structured and orderly, but is it really scientific? Marxist teachings do take a tone of authority as well as finality and
religiosity (Laibman, 1998). There seems to be a loss when it comes to dialectic and subtlety and this to an extent contradicts critical as well as open qualities that are
...