Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Is It Immoral To Believe A Claim Without Evidence?. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. To believe is to place one's faith in what is being put forth; whether the origin is written, spoken or visual, belief can be cultivated with very little proof to support conviction toward an otherwise improvable concept or image. Scientists understand the critical importance of believing a claim only after tangible evidence can be demonstrated, inasmuch as they are in a wholly awkward position to accept things as true merely because they are told so. The scientific community works within a highly controlled environment whereby speculation and theoretical inference hold no value; to do otherwise is to morally jeopardize the foundation upon which methodical, precise research is conducted. From an entirely different perspective, however, is that of philosophy and the oftentimes unverifiable claims that are accepted as truths. Being that philosophical conjecture is based solely upon one's personal point of view that incorporates thought processes not always shared by others, it stands to reason how morality's role in believing a theoretic claim without evidence is indeed a commonality. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCImmrlBelv.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
support conviction toward an otherwise improvable concept or image. Evidentialists understand the critical importance of believing a claim only after tangible evidence can be demonstrated, inasmuch as they do
not place themselves in the awkward position of accepting things as true merely because they are told so. The scientific community, for example, works within a highly controlled environment
whereby speculation and theoretical inference hold no value; to do otherwise is to morally jeopardize the foundation upon which methodical, precise research is conducted. From an entirely different perspective,
however, is that of philosophy or religion and the oftentimes unverifiable claims that are accepted as truths. Being that these conjectures are based solely upon ones personal point of
view that incorporates thought processes not always shared by others, it stands to reason how moralitys role in believing a theoretic claim without evidence is indeed a commonality. There
are countless things that we not only believe but have a right to believe even though we lack proof or evidence [otherwise] we would lose our right to affirm a
large number of important claims that only a fool would question (Nash, 1992, p. 91). Of all the claims that lack evidence,
none are as morally immense or elusive as whether or not God exists. Supporters contend there is absolutely no doubt as to His existence and to question the validity
of this claim is to question ones own being. Others, however, require more than mere verbal validation in order to find it reasonable to believe that God exists, which
is why myriad debates on the subject end up focusing upon a more palpable approach to supporting Gods legitimacy. From the teleological perspective,
...