Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Interrogating Suspects. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 3 page paper that discusses two broad topics. The paper begins by reporting different interrogation techniques with some tips. The writer also discusses the kinds of statements that are admissible. This incorporates the Miranda Rights. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: ME12_PGsuspq10.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
using the logic and reasoning technique with a repeat offender or a hardened criminal, the interrogator needs to convince the suspect that the evidence is clear and guilt can be
easily established so there is no sense in denying he committed the crime (Integrated Publishing, 2008). Each time the suspect denies the crime, the interrogator meets each denial with evidence
or statements from others that refute the suspects alibi and that show his guilt (Integrated Publishing, 2008). Det. Sgt. Tom Bolling (1999) reminds officers they can lie. For instance, they
could say that someone has already identified the suspect as the perpetrator when that is not true. The psychological approach focuses on the suspects thoughts and feelings and even
on the moral aspects related to the crime (Integrated Publishing, 2008). The intended outcome of this approach is lead the suspect to the realization that they did something that was
wrong (Integrated Publishing, 2008). Officers often begin this session by discussing things like the effects the crime will have on the suspects family, their responsibility as a citizen and the
harm the crime did to the victims (Integrated Publishing, 2008). The psychological approach requires a great deal of knowledge and skill because the interrogator does not want to push
the suspect so far they become extremely emotional (Integrated Publishing, 2008). At that point, their statements would not be admissible in a court (Integrated Publishing, 2008). Bolling (1999) also points
out the importance of nonverbal cues when interrogating a suspect. For instance, the suspect says he was home with the kids all day, the officer might just shake his head,
more or less dismissing that the suspect just said (Bolling, 1999). Statements to the suspect that the story just does not make sense or that he is not convincing you
...