Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on International Relations Theories Analyzed. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 7 page research paper discusses international relations as it endeavors to identify current problems, dangers an sources of tension. Specifically discussed are the three prevailing theories of gender, dependency and realism to determine which one most effectively addresses the problems of international relations today. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_Irtheory.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
the so-called world superpowers moving and counter-moving their chess pieces, which are the countries inevitably caught up in a struggle for power, global prestige and economic prosperity. In its
most basic form, the study of international relations is just what the name implies -- an examination as to how nations of the world get along with each other.
However, the study never remains pristine for very long. One of the major problems with understanding international relations is that it is heavily laden with complex theories. Currently,
the three most prevalent theories which propose solutions unique to the area of international relations are realism, dependency and gender. Realism is the granddaddy of all international relations
theories. It was primarily the brainchild of American political scientist Hans Morgenthau who believed that human beings are perpetually driven by a desire for power (Spanier 39). It
was based on the psychological studies of Sigmund Freud, who concluded that mans propensity for war, "manifests itself spontaneously and reveals men as savage beasts to whom the thought of
sparing their own kind is alien" (Spanier 38). This theory is deceptively simple, and implies that every nations motivation is basically the same -- self-protection. The way to
do this, in the international arena is by securing ones base of power within the state, and try to solidify this power through territorial acquisition. It is the ultimate
policy of, "My country right or wrong" (Spanier 39), and international relation, in the realist view is reduced to an infinite struggle among nations for a finite amount of power.
This was certainly true during the days of Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes, but what about today? During the 1960s and 70s, the realists concluded that the only
...