Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Insider Trading and Martha Stewart. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 4 page paper answering 3 questions: find a 2005 conviction for insider trading; report the charges against Martha Stewart and why she was not charged with insider trading; and provide a personal opinion of whether Stewart should have been tried, convicted and imprisoned. The paper provides a negative answer to the final question. Stewart may have been guilty or may not have been, but prosecutors operated an extremely sloppy investigation. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: CC6_KSlawInsTrading.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
insider trading in the past two years. In March 2005 Dr. Roger D. Blackwell received the 16th Annual Mortar Board and Sphinx Faculty
and Staff Recognition award at Ohio State University. Dr. Blackwell has been named "Outstanding Marketing Educator in America by Sales and Marketing Executives International and Marketer of the Year
by the American Marketing Association. He also received the Alumni Distinguished Teaching Award, the highest award given by The Ohio State University" (Ohio State Professor Convicted of Insider Trading, 2005).
In June 2005, the leading marketing professor with 30 years with Ohio State University was convicted on 14 counts of insider trading (Berner and Beucke, 2005). Blackwell will
be sentenced later in 2005; he remains free until sentencing on the basis of a $1 million cash bond (Ohio State Professor Convicted of Insider Trading, 2005). 2. What
was Martha Stewart convicted of and why was she not charged with insider trading? The original indictment listed nine charges against either
or both defendants in the case, Martha Stewart and her broker Peter Bacanovic. The first charge included both Stewart and Bacanovic; counts three, four, eight and nine included Stewart
only (United States v. Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic: Indictment). Those specifically referring to and including Martha Stewart were: Count One.
Conspiracy to obstruct justice, make false statements and commit perjury. Count Three. False statements to investigators by Martha Stewart.
Count Four. False statements by Martha Stewart charging that Martha Stewart lied to the district attorney at least three times.
...