Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Inherent Rights: Freedom Of Speech. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
9 pages in length. People "cannot stifle free speech because [they] don't want to hear it" (Mass, 2005, p. 33) in a country where liberty and personal rights are as essential to one's existence as are the life-sustaining elements of food and water. According to a judgment in the 1999 Redmond-Bate v DPP case, Lord Justice Sedley contended that free speech consists of "not only the inoffensive, but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the provocative, provided that it did not tend to provoke violence" (Anonymous, 2003). Bibliography lists 10 sources.
Page Count:
9 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCFreeSpch.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
many eyes, censorship was nothing more than a fundamental attack upon an individuals right to express his or her views; it was the progressives aim to eliminate such suppressive activity.
Myriad Supreme Court cases have revolved around the notion of First Amendment rights pertaining to content and place, with the high court often ruling that states were not allowed
to forbid expression due to either element resulting from state-based standards. Indeed, within the past several years, the Supreme Court has had to grapple with many controversial First Amendment
issues and decide accordingly the best way to appease both the law and the public. A number of such issues have represented the ever-changing times where individuals are routinely
forced to seek legal guidance from the nations highest court as a means by which to come to a fair and impartial resolution. "Freedom of speech is not a
decorative amenity in a liberal democracy. Its fundamental to its structure. Without it, other rights and freedoms are effectively empty, because they cannot be asserted, and still less
defended, when free speech is forbidden" (Grayling, 2004). II. WHO CAN SPEAK FREELY? The issue of free speech became an intensely debated
issue when Hare Krishnas were told they could no longer solicit at Los Angeles International Airport because of their harassing demeanor. Despite arguments from opponents to the ban, it
was contended that "solicitation at the airport...interrupts the progress of travelers and teaches people that the best way to raise money is to beg" (Bernstein, 1997). The legal ping
pong that ensued revolved around whether or not it was lawful to ban Krishna solicitation and if it was, then every other organization that did the same thing would then
...