Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Impact Of Intervention Techniques Used In Preventing Workplace Injuries And Illnesses. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
7 pages in length. Injuries and illnesses are not uncommon within the work environment, however, the extent to which both can be minimized goes a long way in decreasing the prevalence. Basic hygiene practices and awareness of/action toward potentially dangerous conditions serve as but two of many critical intervention techniques meant to prevent - or at least reduce - injury and illness in the workplace. Bibliography lists 9 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCWkplInjIll.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Basic hygiene practices and awareness of/action toward potentially dangerous conditions serve as but two of many critical intervention techniques meant to prevent - or at least reduce - injury and
illness in the workplace. ...[Workplace injuries and illnesses] remain a constant source of lost productivity for employers, increased employee absence, as well as an economic drain on companies...While some
live by the mantra that the chief danger in life is to take too many precautions ... this is not a sensible philosophy for any employer (Kochman, 2007).
While there is not shortage of Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) codes that mandate intervention techniques in preventing workplace injuries and illnesses, this
is not to say all employers follow the letter of the law when it comes to being proactive about prevention. Those who think they can get away with skirting
the regulations pose a significant threat to the workers, the company and themselves, inasmuch as it takes but one preventable incident to penalize, close down and/or imprison those found to
be blatantly negligent. For example, Luthers dismissal was not only illegal in nature, but it was also an obvious display of ignorance and disregard on the part of the
employer. That Luther feared the same fatal outcome as Joe suffered is reason enough to understand his trepidation; however, inasmuch as the hole had yet to be repaired -
the very same one that ultimately allowed Joe to fall to his death - clearly violates federal OSHA codes, which are in place for the explicit reason of protecting workers
from just such a negligent infraction. Luther was not being insubordinate when he refused to retrieve the parts that lay hanging in the
...