Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Immigration Reform. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 6-page paper discusses both sides of immigration reform and the number benefits the United States government would be entitled to if they had an open-border policy.
Page Count:
8 pages (~225 words per page)
File: PG56_GPAimmigration.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
September 11, 2001, the United States feels it has an obligation to protect its borders while enhancing the security and general welfare of the American people. Therefore, the United States
government has established strict immigration and customs laws to prevent illegal aliens and immigrants who may be out to do this country and its people harm. Millions, if not billions
of dollars have been allocated to these departments and agencies to ensure they have the technology, resources and personnel to enforce these laws. In addition, it is almost incomprehensible to
fully appreciate how big the United States is and how many border towns exist. Therefore, one can easily conclude, that the country, when it comes to border patrol personnel is
still very much understaffed. However, as the debate continues in Washington and in these numerous border towns, there are basically two sides to the argument. There are those that are
in favor of opening up Americas borders and giving immigrants the same opportunities an American citizen would have. Economically, they also feel the technology, staff and resources that are required
to police the borders is an unnecessary expense and can be utilized in more productive and efficient ways. On the other side of the coin, however, many believe that immigration
should be strictly regulated and immigrants should have to meet certain criteria in order to come and live in the United States and become an American citizen. They also argue
that if America opens the borders to anyone and everyone, fewer resources like public schools and hospitals and social government benefits will be available, which are currently programs funded by
the American taxpayer. These same proponents also claim that it would reduce the number of jobs available to American citizens, which they feel should be granted to an American citizen
...